fbpx

LETS GET DOWN TO BUSINESS.

Question :
Context: Products with visual/ functional differentiation that is patentable has obvious benefits in retaining margin and market share. We have a identified a product that has a few competitors that have a cookie cutter approach in design and eroding each other’s margin that we believe we can demand a higher premium. Question: Is there experience within this group with engineering patentable differentiation in products, and finding manufacturers that are flexible with custom designs without breaking the bank/ margin? 

Question submitted 08/11/20 @ 01:48pm
Industry: New Product Development / R&D
281
VIEW
0
VOTE
    • Up
      2
      Down

      This is a hard question – I know a few people – first however, when you said you have something that is patentable, is that because it is totally original in application and/or design? I ask this because when the concept is already a thing – and you are reverse engineering a different approach in the category, that can be harder to patent (i think) – on your question of manufacturers that are flexible, the group generally are much more open right now, albeit the qualifying comment is that it really depends on what type of manufacturing you are talking about – some flexibility but many also realise more than ever how much their costs are – so are keen to make sure they get recovery. A

    • Up
      2
      Down

      Hi There,

      As Andy mentioned, this is a tricky question. Are you looking to patent the product? Or the process of making the product?

      Forgive me if I point out the obvious to you. Patenting a product is certainly possible, but you have to document how your product is different in form/function – and this is finicky enough that you would be best to engage a patent attorney to write the provisional patent and file it. The process takes quite a long time through to granted patent – minimum 18 months in NZ.
      A consideration is that if you do indeed gain a granted patent for a differentiated product in a crowded category, that shows that others could do the same.

      Process patents, focusing on HOW something is made can be more powerful in ‘blocking’ others, but you have to ‘reduced it practice’ – that is you have to make it and show data on that process.

      It may be easier to trademark the shape of the product, which gives you some protection and is cheaper and easier to obtain. Again, you are best served to engage a patent attorney for this work to get it right.

      Agree with Andy’s comments re: manufacturers.

      Good luck!
      Sherif

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.